I’m working on a health & medical discussion question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn.
Respond to the following
How do you use assertive, aggressive, or passive communication styles to cement professional relationships with managers or executives who are higher in the organizational chart? Provide specific examples of when you might use each.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction: In order to effectively cement professional relationships with managers or executives who are higher in the organizational chart, it is essential to consider different communication styles. Assertive, aggressive, and passive communication styles each have their own advantages and disadvantages, and understanding when to use each style can contribute to building strong professional relationships. It is important to note that the approach should vary based on the specific circumstances and individuals involved.
1. Assertive Communication Style:
Assertive communication is characterized by expressing one’s thoughts, feelings, and needs in a respectful and confident manner while considering the thoughts and feelings of others. It involves effective listening, clear articulation of ideas, and standing up for oneself without violating the rights of others. Using assertive communication can help establish respectful and collaborative relationships with managers or executives.
Example: When seeking clarification on a project task assigned by a manager, an assertive communication style could be used. One might say, “I appreciate the opportunity to work on this project. However, I am seeking some clarification on the specific goals and expectations. Could you please provide more details so that I can deliver the desired outcomes effectively?”
2. Aggressive Communication Style:
Aggressive communication involves expressing one’s thoughts, feelings, and needs in a forceful and hostile manner without considering the thoughts and feelings of others. It often involves blaming, accusing, or attacking others verbally. While aggressive communication may provide immediate results, it can damage professional relationships and hinder effective collaboration.
Example: If a disagreement arises between a medical professor and a manager regarding a curriculum change, an aggressive communication style might involve saying, “You clearly don’t understand the value of this change. It’s essential for student success, and your resistance is hindering progress.” However, it is crucial to note that an aggressive approach is generally not recommended for building and maintaining professional relationships.
3. Passive Communication Style:
Passive communication involves avoiding conflict or expressing one’s thoughts, feelings, and needs. It often entails yielding to others’ preferences without considering one’s own needs, resulting in a lack of assertiveness. While passive communication may initially avoid conflicts, it can lead to unaddressed issues and potential resentment.
Example: In a situation where a medical professor disagrees with a decision made by an executive, a passive communication style may involve saying nothing and accepting the decision without expressing concerns or suggestions. However, this passive approach can hinder open dialogue and limit opportunities for growth and improvement.
In conclusion, effective communication is crucial for building and maintaining professional relationships with managers or executives who are higher in the organizational chart. Utilizing an assertive communication style is generally recommended as it allows for respectful expression of thoughts and needs while considering the perspectives of others. Aggressive communication should be avoided due to its potential to damage relationships, while passive communication can limit opportunities for collaboration and growth. It is essential to adapt communication styles based on the specific circumstances and individuals involved to foster positive professional relationships.
#MHA #University #Phoenix #Communication #Styles #Discussion